Troubling the ‘self’ in self-protection

Anastasia Prokhorova, Louise Ridden

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Self-protection heeds the promise to disrupt the often-gendered hierarchies intrinsic to the relations between the protector and the protected. At the same time, relational feminists have more recently troubled the very notion of ‘self’ as deeply grounded in the body politic of the modern State, on the one hand, and the liberal imaginary of the sovereign individual, on the other. Drawing on this critique, we unpack who the ‘self’ is in self-protection and what kind of ‘bodies’ it claims to represent. Moving away from ethical individualism towards the feminist ethics of solidarity, we reimagine self-protection in relation to the collective body of the social or political community, where all subjects are able to act as both protectors and the protected. By uprooting the ‘self’ of protection from the liberal framework of sovereign state/individual, this intervention opens up the space to explore new possibilities for collective action for protection, based on a relational co-production of self.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCRITICAL STUDIES ON SECURITY
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2024
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • embodiment
  • Protection
  • relationality
  • self-protection
  • sovereignty
  • unarmed civilian protection

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Troubling the ‘self’ in self-protection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this