Assessing the credibility of COVID-19 vaccine mis/disinformation in online discussion

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkeliScientificvertaisarvioitu

8 Lataukset (Pure)

Abstrakti

This study examines how the credibility of the content of mis- or disinformation, as well as the believability of authors creating such information is assessed in online discussion. More specifically, the investigation was focused on the credibility of mis- or disinformation about COVID-19 vaccines. To this end, a sample of 1887 messages posted to a Reddit discussion group was scrutinised by means of qualitative content analysis. The findings indicate that in the assessment of the author’s credibility, the most important criteria are his or her reputation, expertise and honesty in argumentation. In the judgement of the credibility of the content of mis/disinformation, objectivity of information and plausibility of arguments are highly important. The findings highlight that in the assessment of the credibility of mis/disinformation, the author’s qualities such as poor reputation, incompetency and dishonesty are particularly significant because they trigger expectancies about how the information content created by the author is judged.
AlkuperäiskieliEnglanti
JulkaisuJOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaE-pub ahead of print - elok. 2021
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Julkaisufoorumi-taso

  • Jufo-taso 2

Sormenjälki

Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'Assessing the credibility of COVID-19 vaccine mis/disinformation in online discussion'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.

Siteeraa tätä