Siirry päänavigointiin Siirry hakuun Siirry pääsisältöön

ASSIP vs. Crisis Counseling for Preventing Suicide Re-attempts: Outcome Predictor Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial Data

  • Petri Arvilommi
  • , Jukka Valkonen
  • , Lars Lindholm
  • , Selma Gaily-Luoma
  • , Kirsi Suominen
  • , Anja Gysin-Maillart
  • , Outi Ruishalme
  • , Erkki Isometsä*
  • *Tämän työn vastaava kirjoittaja

    Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

    5 Sitaatiot (Scopus)

    Abstrakti

    Objective: Knowledge of the effectiveness and limits of the suitability of brief interventions in suicide prevention is greatly needed. We investigated subgroup differences and predictors for suicide re-attempts within a clinical trial population recruited for a brief intervention to prevent re-attempts. Methods: Consenting adult patients receiving treatment for a suicide attempt in Helsinki City general hospital emergency rooms in 2016–2017 (n = 239) were randomly allocated to (a) the Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP) or (b) Crisis Counseling (CC). Participants also received their usual treatment. Information on primary outcome repeat attempts and secondary outcomes was collected via telephone and from medical and psychiatric records for 2 years. As proportions of re-attempts did not differ significantly between ASSIP and CC (29.2 vs. 35.2%), patients were pooled and predictors for suicide re-attempts were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and logistic regression analyses. Results: Re-attempts were predicted by participants’ younger age (OR 0.965 [0.933–0.998]), previous suicide attempts (OR 2.437 [1.106–5.370]), psychiatric hospitalization in the year preceding baseline (OR 3.256 [1.422–7.458]), and clinical diagnosis of a personality disorder (OR 4.244 [1.923–9.370]), especially borderline personality disorder (OR 5.922 [2.558–13.709]). Conclusions: Within a population of suicide attempters consenting to a brief intervention trial, the risk of re-attempt was strongly predicted by subjects’ young age, history of previous attempts, psychiatric hospitalizations, and personality disorder, particularly borderline personality disorder. The composition of treated populations with regard to these characteristics may strongly influence the observed success of brief interventions. Their potential as moderators of treatment effectiveness and as indicators of the utility of brief interventions warrants further investigation.HIGHLIGHTS During the 2-year follow-up, 32% of trial participants reattempted suicide. Rates of reattempts varied and were strongly predicted by clinical subgroup. Subgroup composition may strongly influence brief interventions’ observed outcome.

    AlkuperäiskieliEnglanti
    Sivut184-199
    Sivumäärä16
    JulkaisuArchives of Suicide Research
    Vuosikerta28
    Numero1
    Varhainen verkossa julkaisun päivämäärä2022
    DOI - pysyväislinkit
    TilaJulkaistu - 2024
    OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

    YK:n kestävän kehityksen tavoitteet

    Tämä tuotos edistää seuraavia kestävän kehityksen tavoitteita:

    1. SDG 3 – Hyvä terveys ja hyvinvointi
      SDG 3 – Hyvä terveys ja hyvinvointi

    Julkaisufoorumi-taso

    • Jufo-taso 1

    !!ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Clinical Psychology
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Sormenjälki

    Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'ASSIP vs. Crisis Counseling for Preventing Suicide Re-attempts: Outcome Predictor Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial Data'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.

    Siteeraa tätä