TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of three risk stratification scores in gastroschisis neonates
T2 - gastroschisis prognostic score, gastroschisis risk stratification index and complex gastroschisis
AU - Tauriainen, Asta
AU - Raitio, Arimatias
AU - Tauriainen, Tuomas
AU - Vanamo, Kari
AU - Sankilampi, Ulla
AU - Helenius, Ilkka
AU - Hyvärinen, Anna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the utility of three different risk stratification scores for gastroschisis neonates; simple/complex gastroschisis, gastroschisis prognostic score and risk stratification index. Methods: Data of neonates born with gastroschisis between the years 1993 and 2015 were collected. The national registers and patient records of four Finnish University Hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic and linear regression analysis were performed to identify independent predictors for adverse outcomes. The efficacy of these prognostic methods was further assessed using ROC-curves and DeLong (1988) test. Results: Gastroschisis risk stratification index was an acceptable predictor of in-hospital mortality, AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.48–0.91, p = 0.049. Complex gastroschisis and gastroschisis prognostic score were able to predict short bowel syndrome, AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.58–1.00, p = 0.012 and AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.59–1.00, p = 0.012, respectively. Conclusion: There are three easily obtainable risk stratification scores for outcome prediction in gastroschisis patients, however, their predictive ability did not have a statistical difference in the present study. The Gastroschisis risk stratification index seemed to perform moderately well in mortality prediction.
AB - Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the utility of three different risk stratification scores for gastroschisis neonates; simple/complex gastroschisis, gastroschisis prognostic score and risk stratification index. Methods: Data of neonates born with gastroschisis between the years 1993 and 2015 were collected. The national registers and patient records of four Finnish University Hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic and linear regression analysis were performed to identify independent predictors for adverse outcomes. The efficacy of these prognostic methods was further assessed using ROC-curves and DeLong (1988) test. Results: Gastroschisis risk stratification index was an acceptable predictor of in-hospital mortality, AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.48–0.91, p = 0.049. Complex gastroschisis and gastroschisis prognostic score were able to predict short bowel syndrome, AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.58–1.00, p = 0.012 and AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.59–1.00, p = 0.012, respectively. Conclusion: There are three easily obtainable risk stratification scores for outcome prediction in gastroschisis patients, however, their predictive ability did not have a statistical difference in the present study. The Gastroschisis risk stratification index seemed to perform moderately well in mortality prediction.
KW - Complex gastroschisis
KW - Gastroschisis
KW - Level of evidence: Level III
KW - Risk stratification
KW - Score
U2 - 10.1007/s00383-022-05180-5
DO - 10.1007/s00383-022-05180-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85134806032
SN - 0179-0358
VL - 38
JO - PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL
JF - PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL
IS - 10
ER -