TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-culturally approaching the cycling behaviour questionnaire (CBQ)
T2 - Evidence from 19 countries
AU - Useche, Sergio A.
AU - Alonso, Francisco
AU - Boyko, Aleksey
AU - Buyvol, Polina
AU - Castañeda, Isaac
AU - Cendales, Boris
AU - Cervantes, Arturo
AU - Echiburu, Tomas
AU - Faus, Mireia
AU - Feitosa, Zuleide
AU - Gene, Javier
AU - Gonzalez-Marin, Adela
AU - Gonzalez, Victor
AU - Gnap, Jozef
AU - Ibrahim, Mohd K.
AU - Janstrup, Kira H.
AU - Javadinejad, Arash
AU - Makarova, Irijna
AU - McIlroy, Rich
AU - Mikusova, Miroslava
AU - Møller, Mette
AU - Ngueuteu-Fouaka, Sylvain
AU - O'Hern, Steve
AU - Orozco-Fontalvo, Mauricio
AU - Shubenkova, Ksenia
AU - Siebert, Felix
AU - Soto, Jose
AU - Stephens, Amanda N.
AU - Valle-Escolano, Raquel
AU - Wang, Yonggang
AU - Willberg, Ellias
AU - Wintersberger, Phillip
AU - Zeuwts, Linus
AU - Zulkipli, Zarir H.
AU - Montoro, Luis
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the participants and countless institutional stakeholders supporting the “Bike-Barometer 2020-2021” project that framed the data collection of this study, and Sara Pascual for proofreading the final manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Given different advances in applied literature, risky and positive behaviours keep gaining ground as key contributors for riding safety outcomes. In this regard, the Cycling Behaviour Questionnaire (CBQ) represents one of the tools available to assess the core dimensions of cycling behaviour and their relationship with road safety outcomes from a behavioural perspective. Nevertheless, it has never been psychometrically approached through a cross-cultural perspective. Therefore, this study aimed to perform the cross-cultural validation of the CBQ, examining its psychometric properties, reliability indexes, validity insights and descriptive scores in 19 countries distributed across five regions: Europe, America, Asia, Africa, and Oceania. For this purpose, it was used the data retrieved from a full sample of 7,001 urban cyclists responding to a large-scale electronic survey. Participants had a mean age of M = 36.15 (SD = 14.71), ranging between 16 and 83 years. The results of this large-scale study empirically support the assumption that the 29-item version of the CBQ has a fair dimensional structure and item composition, good internal consistency, reliability indexes, and an interesting set of validity insights. Among these results, there can be highlighted that: (i) Structurally speaking, the questionnaire works better under a three-factor dimensionality, keeping all its 29 items, whose factor loadings are >0.400 in all cases; (ii) The CBQ shows greater reliability indexes than in previous applications using smaller samples, with good Cronbach's alphas [0.768 - 0.915], McDonald's omegas [0.770 - 0.913] and Composite Reliability Indexes [981 - 0.994]; and (iii) Robust tests comparing riding behaviours of riders with different levels of risk perception and crash involvement support the concurrent validity of the Cycling Behaviour Questionnaire. These outcomes endorse the usefulness of the CBQ to assess both risky and positive riding behaviours of cyclists in different countries, contributing to assess and improve cycling safety from the human factors approach.
AB - Given different advances in applied literature, risky and positive behaviours keep gaining ground as key contributors for riding safety outcomes. In this regard, the Cycling Behaviour Questionnaire (CBQ) represents one of the tools available to assess the core dimensions of cycling behaviour and their relationship with road safety outcomes from a behavioural perspective. Nevertheless, it has never been psychometrically approached through a cross-cultural perspective. Therefore, this study aimed to perform the cross-cultural validation of the CBQ, examining its psychometric properties, reliability indexes, validity insights and descriptive scores in 19 countries distributed across five regions: Europe, America, Asia, Africa, and Oceania. For this purpose, it was used the data retrieved from a full sample of 7,001 urban cyclists responding to a large-scale electronic survey. Participants had a mean age of M = 36.15 (SD = 14.71), ranging between 16 and 83 years. The results of this large-scale study empirically support the assumption that the 29-item version of the CBQ has a fair dimensional structure and item composition, good internal consistency, reliability indexes, and an interesting set of validity insights. Among these results, there can be highlighted that: (i) Structurally speaking, the questionnaire works better under a three-factor dimensionality, keeping all its 29 items, whose factor loadings are >0.400 in all cases; (ii) The CBQ shows greater reliability indexes than in previous applications using smaller samples, with good Cronbach's alphas [0.768 - 0.915], McDonald's omegas [0.770 - 0.913] and Composite Reliability Indexes [981 - 0.994]; and (iii) Robust tests comparing riding behaviours of riders with different levels of risk perception and crash involvement support the concurrent validity of the Cycling Behaviour Questionnaire. These outcomes endorse the usefulness of the CBQ to assess both risky and positive riding behaviours of cyclists in different countries, contributing to assess and improve cycling safety from the human factors approach.
KW - Behavioural questionnaires
KW - CBQ
KW - Cycling safety
KW - Regions
KW - Riding behaviour
KW - Urban cycling
U2 - 10.1016/j.trf.2022.10.025
DO - 10.1016/j.trf.2022.10.025
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85141329659
SN - 1369-8478
VL - 91
SP - 386
EP - 400
JO - TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F: TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR
JF - TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F: TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR
ER -