Cross-culturally approaching the cycling behaviour questionnaire (CBQ): Evidence from 19 countries

Sergio A. Useche, Francisco Alonso, Aleksey Boyko, Polina Buyvol, Isaac Castañeda, Boris Cendales, Arturo Cervantes, Tomas Echiburu, Mireia Faus, Zuleide Feitosa, Javier Gene, Adela Gonzalez-Marin, Victor Gonzalez, Jozef Gnap, Mohd K. Ibrahim, Kira H. Janstrup, Arash Javadinejad, Irijna Makarova, Rich McIlroy, Miroslava MikusovaMette Møller, Sylvain Ngueuteu-Fouaka, Steve O'Hern, Mauricio Orozco-Fontalvo, Ksenia Shubenkova, Felix Siebert, Jose Soto, Amanda N. Stephens, Raquel Valle-Escolano, Yonggang Wang, Ellias Willberg, Phillip Wintersberger, Linus Zeuwts, Zarir H. Zulkipli, Luis Montoro

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

19 Sitaatiot (Scopus)
8 Lataukset (Pure)

Abstrakti

Given different advances in applied literature, risky and positive behaviours keep gaining ground as key contributors for riding safety outcomes. In this regard, the Cycling Behaviour Questionnaire (CBQ) represents one of the tools available to assess the core dimensions of cycling behaviour and their relationship with road safety outcomes from a behavioural perspective. Nevertheless, it has never been psychometrically approached through a cross-cultural perspective. Therefore, this study aimed to perform the cross-cultural validation of the CBQ, examining its psychometric properties, reliability indexes, validity insights and descriptive scores in 19 countries distributed across five regions: Europe, America, Asia, Africa, and Oceania. For this purpose, it was used the data retrieved from a full sample of 7,001 urban cyclists responding to a large-scale electronic survey. Participants had a mean age of M = 36.15 (SD = 14.71), ranging between 16 and 83 years. The results of this large-scale study empirically support the assumption that the 29-item version of the CBQ has a fair dimensional structure and item composition, good internal consistency, reliability indexes, and an interesting set of validity insights. Among these results, there can be highlighted that: (i) Structurally speaking, the questionnaire works better under a three-factor dimensionality, keeping all its 29 items, whose factor loadings are >0.400 in all cases; (ii) The CBQ shows greater reliability indexes than in previous applications using smaller samples, with good Cronbach's alphas [0.768 - 0.915], McDonald's omegas [0.770 - 0.913] and Composite Reliability Indexes [981 - 0.994]; and (iii) Robust tests comparing riding behaviours of riders with different levels of risk perception and crash involvement support the concurrent validity of the Cycling Behaviour Questionnaire. These outcomes endorse the usefulness of the CBQ to assess both risky and positive riding behaviours of cyclists in different countries, contributing to assess and improve cycling safety from the human factors approach.

AlkuperäiskieliEnglanti
Sivut386-400
Sivumäärä15
JulkaisuTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F: TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR
Vuosikerta91
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - marrask. 2022
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Rahoitus

The authors would like to thank the participants and countless institutional stakeholders supporting the “Bike-Barometer 2020-2021” project that framed the data collection of this study, and Sara Pascual for proofreading the final manuscript.

Julkaisufoorumi-taso

  • Jufo-taso 1

!!ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Transportation
  • Applied Psychology

Sormenjälki

Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'Cross-culturally approaching the cycling behaviour questionnaire (CBQ): Evidence from 19 countries'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.

Siteeraa tätä