TY - GEN
T1 - Development options for distribution tariff structures in Finland
AU - Honkapuro, Samuli
AU - Haapaniemi, Jouni
AU - Haakana, Juha
AU - Lassila, Jukka
AU - Belonogova, Nadezda
AU - Partanen, Jarmo
AU - Lummi, Kimmo
AU - Rautiainen, Antti
AU - Supponen, Antti
AU - Repo, Sami
AU - Järventausta, Pertti
N1 - jufoid=70631
INT=eee,"Supponen, Antti"
PY - 2017/7/14
Y1 - 2017/7/14
N2 - In this paper, we study the development options of tariff structures in electricity distribution in Finland. We compare the impacts of three different tariffs from the viewpoints of customers, distribution system operator (DSO), electricity supplier, and society. Analyzed tariffs are (1) energy oriented tariff, which is currently in use, (2) power limit tariff, and (3) power tariff. Based on the analyses, it seems that it is justified to include power based price component in distribution tariff. Generally, the impacts of both analyzed power based tariffs are quite similar. However, it seems that power tariff is a bit stronger candidate. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the benefits of the power-oriented pricing, illustrated in the paper, could be achieved only by well-designed tariff system. Although analyses are based on Finnish case, most of the results are generalizable to other countries also.
AB - In this paper, we study the development options of tariff structures in electricity distribution in Finland. We compare the impacts of three different tariffs from the viewpoints of customers, distribution system operator (DSO), electricity supplier, and society. Analyzed tariffs are (1) energy oriented tariff, which is currently in use, (2) power limit tariff, and (3) power tariff. Based on the analyses, it seems that it is justified to include power based price component in distribution tariff. Generally, the impacts of both analyzed power based tariffs are quite similar. However, it seems that power tariff is a bit stronger candidate. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the benefits of the power-oriented pricing, illustrated in the paper, could be achieved only by well-designed tariff system. Although analyses are based on Finnish case, most of the results are generalizable to other countries also.
KW - Demand response
KW - Distribution tariffs
U2 - 10.1109/EEM.2017.7981930
DO - 10.1109/EEM.2017.7981930
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85027133346
BT - 2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market, EEM 2017
PB - IEEE
T2 - International Conference on the European Energy Market
Y2 - 1 January 2004
ER -