Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in transdisciplinary research

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkeliScientificvertaisarvioitu

9 Lataukset (Pure)

Abstrakti

In this paper, we argue that the new demarcation problem does not need to be framed as the problem of defining a set of necessary and jointly sufficient criteria for distinguishing between acceptable and unacceptable roles that non-epistemic values can play in science. We introduce an alternative way of framing the problem and defend an open-ended list of criteria that can be used in demarcation. Applying such criteria requires context-specific work that clarifies which principles should be used, and possibly leads to the identification of new principles – which then can be added to the open-ended list. We illustrate our approach by examining a context where distinguishing between acceptable and unacceptable value influences in science is both needed and tricky: transdisciplinary research.
AlkuperäiskieliEnglanti
Sivut191-198
JulkaisuSTUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Vuosikerta91
Varhainen verkossa julkaisun päivämäärä2021
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 2022
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Julkaisufoorumi-taso

  • Jufo-taso 2

Sormenjälki

Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in transdisciplinary research'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.

Siteeraa tätä