Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline

Kenneth Holmqvist; Saga Lee Örbom; Ignace T. C. Hooge; Diederick C. Niehorster; Robert G. Alexander; Richard Andersson; Jeroen S. Benjamins; Pieter Blignaut; Anne-Marie Brouwer; Lewis L. Chuang; Kirsten A. Dalrymple; Denis Drieghe; Matt J. Dunn; Ulrich Ettinger; Susann Fiedler; Tom Foulsham; Jos N. van der Geest; Dan Witzner Hansen; Samuel B. Hutton; Enkelejda Kasneci; Alan Kingstone; Paul C. Knox; Ellen M. Kok; Helena Lee; Joy Yeonjoo Lee; Jukka M. Leppänen; Stephen Macknik; Päivi Majaranta; Susana Martinez-Conde; Antje Nuthmann; Marcus Nyström; Jacob L. Orquin; Jorge Otero-Millan; Soon Young Park; Stanislav Popelka; Frank Proudlock; Frank Renkewitz; Austin Roorda; Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck; Bonita Sharif; Frederick Shic; Mark Shovman; Mervyn G. Thomas; Ward Venrooij; Raimondas Zemblys; Roy S. Hessels

doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8

Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline

Kenneth Holmqvist, Saga Lee Örbom, Ignace T. C. Hooge, Diederick C. Niehorster, Robert G. Alexander, Richard Andersson, Jeroen S. Benjamins, Pieter Blignaut, Anne-Marie Brouwer, Lewis L. Chuang, Kirsten A. Dalrymple, Denis Drieghe, Matt J. Dunn, Ulrich Ettinger, Susann Fiedler, Tom Foulsham, Jos N. van der Geest, Dan Witzner Hansen, Samuel B. Hutton, Enkelejda KasneciAlan Kingstone, Paul C. Knox, Ellen M. Kok, Helena Lee, Joy Yeonjoo Lee, Jukka M. Leppänen, Stephen Macknik, Päivi Majaranta, Susana Martinez-Conde, Antje Nuthmann, Marcus Nyström, Jacob L. Orquin, Jorge Otero-Millan, Soon Young Park, Stanislav Popelka, Frank Proudlock, Frank Renkewitz, Austin Roorda, Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Bonita Sharif, Frederick Shic, Mark Shovman, Mervyn G. Thomas, Ward Venrooij, Raimondas Zemblys, Roy S. Hessels

Tietotekniikka

Tutkimustuotos: Artikkeli › Scientific › vertaisarvioitu

6 Lataukset (Pure)

Abstrakti

In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting guideline based on empirical research (Section “An empirically based minimal reporting guideline”).

Alkuperäiskieli	Englanti
Sivumäärä	52
Julkaisu	Behavior Research Methods
DOI - pysyväislinkit	https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8
Tila	E-pub ahead of print - 2022
OKM-julkaisutyyppi	A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Julkaisufoorumi-taso

Jufo-taso 1

Pääsy asiakirjaan

10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8Lisenssi: CC BY

s13428-021-01762-8Final published version, 1,78 MBLisenssi: CC BY

https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202204083115Lisenssi: CC BY

Siteeraa tätä

Holmqvist, K., Örbom, S. L., Hooge, I. T. C., Niehorster, D. C., Alexander, R. G., Andersson, R., Benjamins, J. S., Blignaut, P., Brouwer, A-M., Chuang, L. L., Dalrymple, K. A., Drieghe, D., Dunn, M. J., Ettinger, U., Fiedler, S., Foulsham, T., van der Geest, J. N., Hansen, D. W., Hutton, S. B., ... Hessels, R. S. (2022). Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline. Behavior Research Methods . https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8

@article{c79843bf66ff4977b74b1b0eecbb591e,

title = "Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline",

abstract = "In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting guideline based on empirical research (Section “An empirically based minimal reporting guideline”).",

keywords = "Eye movements, Eye tracking, Data quality, Reporting guidelines, Reporting standards, Reporting practices, Replicability, Reproducibility",

author = "Kenneth Holmqvist and {\"O}rbom, {Saga Lee} and Hooge, {Ignace T. C.} and Niehorster, {Diederick C.} and Alexander, {Robert G.} and Richard Andersson and Benjamins, {Jeroen S.} and Pieter Blignaut and Anne-Marie Brouwer and Chuang, {Lewis L.} and Dalrymple, {Kirsten A.} and Denis Drieghe and Dunn, {Matt J.} and Ulrich Ettinger and Susann Fiedler and Tom Foulsham and {van der Geest}, {Jos N.} and Hansen, {Dan Witzner} and Hutton, {Samuel B.} and Enkelejda Kasneci and Alan Kingstone and Knox, {Paul C.} and Kok, {Ellen M.} and Helena Lee and Lee, {Joy Yeonjoo} and Lepp{\"a}nen, {Jukka M.} and Stephen Macknik and P{\"a}ivi Majaranta and Susana Martinez-Conde and Antje Nuthmann and Marcus Nystr{\"o}m and Orquin, {Jacob L.} and Jorge Otero-Millan and Park, {Soon Young} and Stanislav Popelka and Frank Proudlock and Frank Renkewitz and Austin Roorda and Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck and Bonita Sharif and Frederick Shic and Mark Shovman and Thomas, {Mervyn G.} and Ward Venrooij and Raimondas Zemblys and Hessels, {Roy S.}",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8",

language = "English",

}

Holmqvist, K, Örbom, SL, Hooge, ITC, Niehorster, DC, Alexander, RG, Andersson, R, Benjamins, JS, Blignaut, P, Brouwer, A-M, Chuang, LL, Dalrymple, KA, Drieghe, D, Dunn, MJ, Ettinger, U, Fiedler, S, Foulsham, T, van der Geest, JN, Hansen, DW, Hutton, SB, Kasneci, E, Kingstone, A, Knox, PC, Kok, EM, Lee, H, Lee, JY, Leppänen, JM, Macknik, S, Majaranta, P, Martinez-Conde, S, Nuthmann, A, Nyström, M, Orquin, JL, Otero-Millan, J, Park, SY, Popelka, S, Proudlock, F, Renkewitz, F, Roorda, A, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M, Sharif, B, Shic, F, Shovman, M, Thomas, MG, Venrooij, W, Zemblys, R & Hessels, RS 2022, 'Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline', Behavior Research Methods . https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8

TY - JOUR

T1 - Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline

AU - Holmqvist, Kenneth

AU - Örbom, Saga Lee

AU - Hooge, Ignace T. C.

AU - Niehorster, Diederick C.

AU - Alexander, Robert G.

AU - Andersson, Richard

AU - Benjamins, Jeroen S.

AU - Blignaut, Pieter

AU - Brouwer, Anne-Marie

AU - Chuang, Lewis L.

AU - Dalrymple, Kirsten A.

AU - Drieghe, Denis

AU - Dunn, Matt J.

AU - Ettinger, Ulrich

AU - Fiedler, Susann

AU - Foulsham, Tom

AU - van der Geest, Jos N.

AU - Hansen, Dan Witzner

AU - Hutton, Samuel B.

AU - Kasneci, Enkelejda

AU - Kingstone, Alan

AU - Knox, Paul C.

AU - Kok, Ellen M.

AU - Lee, Helena

AU - Lee, Joy Yeonjoo

AU - Leppänen, Jukka M.

AU - Macknik, Stephen

AU - Majaranta, Päivi

AU - Martinez-Conde, Susana

AU - Nuthmann, Antje

AU - Nyström, Marcus

AU - Orquin, Jacob L.

AU - Otero-Millan, Jorge

AU - Park, Soon Young

AU - Popelka, Stanislav

AU - Proudlock, Frank

AU - Renkewitz, Frank

AU - Roorda, Austin

AU - Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael

AU - Sharif, Bonita

AU - Shic, Frederick

AU - Shovman, Mark

AU - Thomas, Mervyn G.

AU - Venrooij, Ward

AU - Zemblys, Raimondas

AU - Hessels, Roy S.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting guideline based on empirical research (Section “An empirically based minimal reporting guideline”).

AB - In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting guideline based on empirical research (Section “An empirically based minimal reporting guideline”).

KW - Eye movements

KW - Eye tracking

KW - Data quality

KW - Reporting guidelines

KW - Reporting standards

KW - Reporting practices

KW - Replicability

KW - Reproducibility

U2 - 10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8

DO - 10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8

M3 - Article

ER -

Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline

Abstrakti

Julkaisufoorumi-taso

Pääsy asiakirjaan

Sormenjälki

Siteeraa tätä