TY - JOUR
T1 - Gluten-free diet during pregnancy and pregnancy outcome
T2 - A retrospective cohort study
AU - Reijonen, Johanna Kristiina
AU - Tihtonen, Kati Maaria Hannele
AU - Luukkaala, Tiina Hannele
AU - Uotila, Jukka Tapio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective: A gluten-free diet (GFD) is becoming increasingly popular, especially among young females, and including those without diagnosed celiac disease (CD). Whether a GFD is appropriate during pregnancy remains unclear. Our primary aim was to evaluate the association of a GFD and neonatal birthweight and incidence of large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA). Secondarily, we sought associations with other obstetric outcomes. Methods: The data was collected retrospectively from the Tampere University Hospital database. The study period was from January 2015 to April 2021. The diet information was obtained from self-reported questionnaires. All women following a GFD were included. A total of 79 had CD and 291 followed a GFD without CD diagnosis. The latter are referred to here as people without CD avoiding gluten (PWAG). A total of 456 omnivores were randomly chosen to constitute a control group. Outcomes were analyzed by comparing gluten-free groups to a control group. Results: The median birth weight was higher in the GFD group compared to the controls (3533 vs. 3440 g, P < 0.003), but the incidences of SGA or LGA did not differ between the study groups. The incidence of pregnancy complications was comparable between the groups. Induction of labor was more frequent (aOR 1.52; 95% CI: 1.12–2.08), and the duration of labor was longer (aOR1.56; 95% CI: 1.18–2.06) in the GFD group, especially among PWAG. However, no difference in the cesarean section rate were found between the groups. Conclusion: In the present retrospective cohort study, a GFD did not appear to be associated with adverse pregnancy or neonatal outcomes.
AB - Objective: A gluten-free diet (GFD) is becoming increasingly popular, especially among young females, and including those without diagnosed celiac disease (CD). Whether a GFD is appropriate during pregnancy remains unclear. Our primary aim was to evaluate the association of a GFD and neonatal birthweight and incidence of large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA). Secondarily, we sought associations with other obstetric outcomes. Methods: The data was collected retrospectively from the Tampere University Hospital database. The study period was from January 2015 to April 2021. The diet information was obtained from self-reported questionnaires. All women following a GFD were included. A total of 79 had CD and 291 followed a GFD without CD diagnosis. The latter are referred to here as people without CD avoiding gluten (PWAG). A total of 456 omnivores were randomly chosen to constitute a control group. Outcomes were analyzed by comparing gluten-free groups to a control group. Results: The median birth weight was higher in the GFD group compared to the controls (3533 vs. 3440 g, P < 0.003), but the incidences of SGA or LGA did not differ between the study groups. The incidence of pregnancy complications was comparable between the groups. Induction of labor was more frequent (aOR 1.52; 95% CI: 1.12–2.08), and the duration of labor was longer (aOR1.56; 95% CI: 1.18–2.06) in the GFD group, especially among PWAG. However, no difference in the cesarean section rate were found between the groups. Conclusion: In the present retrospective cohort study, a GFD did not appear to be associated with adverse pregnancy or neonatal outcomes.
KW - celiac disease
KW - gluten-free diet
KW - pregnancy
KW - pregnancy outcome
U2 - 10.1002/ijgo.16130
DO - 10.1002/ijgo.16130
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85214817340
SN - 0020-7292
JO - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
JF - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
ER -