TY - JOUR
T1 - Infantographies
AU - Tesar, Marek
AU - Ruiz Guerrero, Margarita
AU - Anttila, Eeva
AU - Newberry, Jan
AU - Hellman, Anette
AU - Wall, John
AU - Santiago-Saamong, Charla Rochella
AU - Bodén, Linnea
AU - Hui, Yu
AU - Nanakida, Atsushi
AU - Diaz-Diaz, Claudia
AU - Xu, Yuwei
AU - Trnka, Susanna
AU - Pacini-Ketchabaw, Veronica
AU - Nxumalo, Fikile
AU - Millei, Zsuzsanna
AU - Malone, Karen
AU - Arndt, Sonja
PY - 2021/12/15
Y1 - 2021/12/15
N2 - Infantographies. There has been a long-standing academic debate by scholars, thinkers and educators around the notions of ‘who is a child’ and ‘what is childhood’. For the purpose of this collective paper, this field is referred to as Infantographies. This paper is part of a series of collective papers that have positioned the child and childhood at the center of academic and philosophical inquiry. The series was started by the collective piece ‘Infantologies’ (Peters et al., 2020), which set the tone for the re-thinking and critically examinaning philosophical, discursive and material aspects of childhoods. This was followed by ‘Infantologies II’ (Gibbons, Peters, Stewart, et al., 2021), and further collective projects have emerged, including ‘Infantilisations’ (Tesar, Peters, White, Charteris, et al., 2021), ‘Infantasies’ (Gibbons, Peters, Delaune, et al., 2021), ‘Infanticides’ (Tesar, Peters, White, Arndt, et al., 2021), and most recently ‘Infantmethodologies’ (Tesar, 2021b), which considered the intersections of the infant and methodologies.
AB - Infantographies. There has been a long-standing academic debate by scholars, thinkers and educators around the notions of ‘who is a child’ and ‘what is childhood’. For the purpose of this collective paper, this field is referred to as Infantographies. This paper is part of a series of collective papers that have positioned the child and childhood at the center of academic and philosophical inquiry. The series was started by the collective piece ‘Infantologies’ (Peters et al., 2020), which set the tone for the re-thinking and critically examinaning philosophical, discursive and material aspects of childhoods. This was followed by ‘Infantologies II’ (Gibbons, Peters, Stewart, et al., 2021), and further collective projects have emerged, including ‘Infantilisations’ (Tesar, Peters, White, Charteris, et al., 2021), ‘Infantasies’ (Gibbons, Peters, Delaune, et al., 2021), ‘Infanticides’ (Tesar, Peters, White, Arndt, et al., 2021), and most recently ‘Infantmethodologies’ (Tesar, 2021b), which considered the intersections of the infant and methodologies.
U2 - 10.1080/00131857.2021.2009341
DO - 10.1080/00131857.2021.2009341
M3 - Article
SN - 0013-1857
JO - EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY
JF - EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY
ER -