TY - JOUR
T1 - Insufficient endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens
T2 - When and why? The analysis of criteria and reasons behind the insufficient specimens
AU - Vuorisalo, Antti
AU - Huhtala, Heini
AU - Paavonen, Timo
AU - Kholová, Ivana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Diagnostic Cytopathology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: The classification terminology systems for pulmonary cytology specimens have recently emerged. Inadequate samples, classified as "nondiagnostic," raise challenges in determining the threshold of cell numbers and the risk of malignancy (ROM). Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed 248 endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) samples: 46 insufficient samples, 60 low cellularity samples, and 142 adequate samples. Characteristics as cellularity, number of benign and malignant cells, and background features were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to establish cell sufficiency thresholds for the diagnosis. Results: Out of the 248 samples analyzed, 108 were classified as benign, 94 as malignant, and 46 as insufficient. The study found that the cellularity thresholds for diagnosis in cell blocks and cytological samples were ≥50 cells and ≥100 cells, respectively. The thresholds for tumor cell counts were ≥1 − 10 cells for both types of cells, respectively. Considerably, some low cellularity samples were initially classified as insufficient despite meeting the diagnostic thresholds upon revision. The ROM varied across sample categories, with insufficient samples having a ROM of 10.9%, benign samples 15.7%, suspicious samples 92.0%, and malignant samples 100%. Conclusion: Insufficient EBUS-TBNA samples raise challenges in diagnosis and management. This study identified the root cause of insufficient samples, including factors related to humans, diagnostic methods, sampling, and laboratory processing. By understanding the root causes, diagnostic recommendations can be developed to improve the diagnostic process. The findings emphasize the importance of standardized classification and terminology systems for clear communication among healthcare professionals and institutions, ultimately improving patient care and enabling quality assurance measures.
AB - Background: The classification terminology systems for pulmonary cytology specimens have recently emerged. Inadequate samples, classified as "nondiagnostic," raise challenges in determining the threshold of cell numbers and the risk of malignancy (ROM). Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed 248 endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) samples: 46 insufficient samples, 60 low cellularity samples, and 142 adequate samples. Characteristics as cellularity, number of benign and malignant cells, and background features were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to establish cell sufficiency thresholds for the diagnosis. Results: Out of the 248 samples analyzed, 108 were classified as benign, 94 as malignant, and 46 as insufficient. The study found that the cellularity thresholds for diagnosis in cell blocks and cytological samples were ≥50 cells and ≥100 cells, respectively. The thresholds for tumor cell counts were ≥1 − 10 cells for both types of cells, respectively. Considerably, some low cellularity samples were initially classified as insufficient despite meeting the diagnostic thresholds upon revision. The ROM varied across sample categories, with insufficient samples having a ROM of 10.9%, benign samples 15.7%, suspicious samples 92.0%, and malignant samples 100%. Conclusion: Insufficient EBUS-TBNA samples raise challenges in diagnosis and management. This study identified the root cause of insufficient samples, including factors related to humans, diagnostic methods, sampling, and laboratory processing. By understanding the root causes, diagnostic recommendations can be developed to improve the diagnostic process. The findings emphasize the importance of standardized classification and terminology systems for clear communication among healthcare professionals and institutions, ultimately improving patient care and enabling quality assurance measures.
KW - adequacy
KW - cell block
KW - EBUS-TBNA
KW - insufficient
KW - lung
KW - pulmonary cytology
U2 - 10.1002/dc.25284
DO - 10.1002/dc.25284
M3 - Article
C2 - 38348643
AN - SCOPUS:85185510311
SN - 8755-1039
VL - 52
SP - 271
EP - 287
JO - DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY
JF - DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY
IS - 5
ER -