TY - JOUR
T1 - Mimicking Barkhausen noise measurement by in-situ transmission electron microscopy - effect of microstructural steel features on Barkhausen noise
AU - Honkanen, Mari
AU - Santa-aho, Suvi
AU - Laurson, Lasse
AU - Eslahi, Nasser
AU - Foi, Alessandro
AU - Vippola, Minnamari
N1 - Funding Information:
Electron microscopy work made use of Tampere Microscopy Center facilities at Tampere University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - A relationship between microstructural steel features and an outcome of the Barkhausen noise (BN) measurement was studied. Two different microstructures, martensite and pearlite-ferrite were used. Commonly, BN is linked directly to the sample hardness. A BN outcome from both martensite and pearlite-ferrite was, however, similar even though martensite has three times higher hardness. To reveal the connection between microstructural features and BN, a typical industrial BN measurement was mimicked by in-situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Martensite needed higher field strength to move domain walls (DWs) than pearlite-ferrite. In martensite, DWs gathered to areas with high dislocation density. Fe3C lamellae in pearlite were strong pinning sites. DWs perpendicular and parallel to martensite laths started to move with the same field strength value. In pearlite, DWs perpendicular to lamellae started to move before the parallel ones. The RMS envelope of ferrite-pearlite starts earlier than that of martensite due to soft ferrite. Magnetically harder pearlite probably caused “a tail” and the envelope ends almost at the same time with martensite. . Nevertheless, similar peak width values were found for both samples. Martensite and pearlite have a lot of strong pinning sites, dislocations and Fe3C, respectively. Fe3C density is not as high as dislocation density. Ferrite has strong pinning sites only at low incidence, but as known, huge BN information volume compared to martensite and pearlite. This resulted in the similar pulse count from martensite and ferrite-pearlite.
AB - A relationship between microstructural steel features and an outcome of the Barkhausen noise (BN) measurement was studied. Two different microstructures, martensite and pearlite-ferrite were used. Commonly, BN is linked directly to the sample hardness. A BN outcome from both martensite and pearlite-ferrite was, however, similar even though martensite has three times higher hardness. To reveal the connection between microstructural features and BN, a typical industrial BN measurement was mimicked by in-situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Martensite needed higher field strength to move domain walls (DWs) than pearlite-ferrite. In martensite, DWs gathered to areas with high dislocation density. Fe3C lamellae in pearlite were strong pinning sites. DWs perpendicular and parallel to martensite laths started to move with the same field strength value. In pearlite, DWs perpendicular to lamellae started to move before the parallel ones. The RMS envelope of ferrite-pearlite starts earlier than that of martensite due to soft ferrite. Magnetically harder pearlite probably caused “a tail” and the envelope ends almost at the same time with martensite. . Nevertheless, similar peak width values were found for both samples. Martensite and pearlite have a lot of strong pinning sites, dislocations and Fe3C, respectively. Fe3C density is not as high as dislocation density. Ferrite has strong pinning sites only at low incidence, but as known, huge BN information volume compared to martensite and pearlite. This resulted in the similar pulse count from martensite and ferrite-pearlite.
KW - Barkhausen noise (BN)
KW - Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD)
KW - Ferromagnetic
KW - In situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
KW - Magnetic domains
KW - Steels
U2 - 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117378
DO - 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117378
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85117415115
SN - 1359-6454
VL - 221
JO - Acta Materialia
JF - Acta Materialia
M1 - 117378
ER -