Sampling site for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR: An intrapatient four-site comparison from Tampere, Finland

Dominik Kerimov, Pekka Tamminen, Hanna Viskari, Lauri Lehtimäki, Janne Aittoniemi

Tutkimustuotos: ArtikkeliScientificvertaisarvioitu

1 Lataukset (Pure)

Abstrakti

Background SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis relies on the performance of nasopharyngeal swabs. Alternative sample sites have been assessed but the heterogeneity of the studies have made comparing different sites difficult. Objectives Our aim was to compare the performance of four different sampling sites for SARS-CoV-2 samples with nasopharynx being the benchmark. Study design COVID-19 positive patients were recruited prospectively, and samples were collected and analysed for SARS-CoV-2 with RT-PCR from all four anatomical sites in 43 patients, who provided written informed consent. Results All anterior nasal and saliva samples were positive, while two oropharyngeal samples were negative. There was no significant difference in the cycle threshold values of nasopharyngeal and anterior nasal samples while saliva and oropharynx had higher cycle threshold values. Conclusions Anterior nasal swab performs as good as nasopharynx swab with saliva also finding all the positives but with higher cycle threshold values. Thus, we can conclude that anterior nasal swabs can be used for SARS-CoV-2 detection instead of nasopharyngeal swabs if the situation would require so.

AlkuperäiskieliEnglanti
Artikkelie0260184
JulkaisuPLoS ONE
Vuosikerta16
Numero11
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 2021
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Julkaisufoorumi-taso

  • Jufo-taso 1

!!ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Sormenjälki

Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'Sampling site for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR: An intrapatient four-site comparison from Tampere, Finland'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.

Siteeraa tätä