Squeeze vs. tilt: A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback

Eve Hoggan; Dari Trendafilov; Teemu Ahmaniemi; Roope Raisamo

doi:10.1145/1979742.1979766

Squeeze vs. tilt: A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback

Eve Hoggan, Dari Trendafilov, Teemu Ahmaniemi, Roope Raisamo

Tutkimustuotos: Konferenssiartikkeli › Scientific › vertaisarvioitu

2 Sitaatiot (Scopus)

Abstrakti

This paper presents an investigation into the performance of squeezing as a manipulative interaction technique in comparison to tilting with an aim to answer two questions: is squeezing an effective input technique for mobile devices and can tactile feedback improve performance? The experiment results show that both input methods are viable but squeezing is significantly faster and more sustainable than tilting (with and without tactile feedback).

Alkuperäiskieli	Englanti
Otsikko	CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts
Sivut	1309-1314
Sivumäärä	6
DOI - pysyväislinkit	https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979766
Tila	Julkaistu - 2011
OKM-julkaisutyyppi	A4 Artikkeli konferenssijulkaisussa
Tapahtuma	29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011 - Kesto: 1 tammik. 2011 → …

Conference

Conference	29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011
Ajanjakso	1/01/11 → …

Tutkimusalat

Haptic I/O
Mobile interaction
Pressure
Squeeze

Julkaisufoorumi-taso

Ei tasoa

Pääsy asiakirjaan

10.1145/1979742.1979766

Siteeraa tätä

@inproceedings{3f9616d7a61c4a118ef0d5080cb5a36d,

title = "Squeeze vs. tilt: A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback",

abstract = "This paper presents an investigation into the performance of squeezing as a manipulative interaction technique in comparison to tilting with an aim to answer two questions: is squeezing an effective input technique for mobile devices and can tactile feedback improve performance? The experiment results show that both input methods are viable but squeezing is significantly faster and more sustainable than tilting (with and without tactile feedback).",

keywords = "Haptic I/O, Mobile interaction, Pressure, Squeeze, Haptic I/O, Mobile interaction, Pressure, Squeeze",

author = "Eve Hoggan and Dari Trendafilov and Teemu Ahmaniemi and Roope Raisamo",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1145/1979742.1979766",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-4503-0228-9",

pages = "1309--1314",

booktitle = "CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts",

note = "29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011 ; Conference date: 01-01-2011",

}

Hoggan, E, Trendafilov, D, Ahmaniemi, T & Raisamo, R 2011, Squeeze vs. tilt: A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback. julkaisussa CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts. Sivut 1309-1314, 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011, 1/01/11. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979766

TY - GEN

T1 - Squeeze vs. tilt: A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback

AU - Hoggan, Eve

AU - Trendafilov, Dari

AU - Ahmaniemi, Teemu

AU - Raisamo, Roope

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This paper presents an investigation into the performance of squeezing as a manipulative interaction technique in comparison to tilting with an aim to answer two questions: is squeezing an effective input technique for mobile devices and can tactile feedback improve performance? The experiment results show that both input methods are viable but squeezing is significantly faster and more sustainable than tilting (with and without tactile feedback).

AB - This paper presents an investigation into the performance of squeezing as a manipulative interaction technique in comparison to tilting with an aim to answer two questions: is squeezing an effective input technique for mobile devices and can tactile feedback improve performance? The experiment results show that both input methods are viable but squeezing is significantly faster and more sustainable than tilting (with and without tactile feedback).

KW - Haptic I/O

KW - Mobile interaction

KW - Pressure

KW - Squeeze

KW - Haptic I/O

KW - Mobile interaction

KW - Pressure

KW - Squeeze

U2 - 10.1145/1979742.1979766

DO - 10.1145/1979742.1979766

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:79957943879

SN - 978-1-4503-0228-9

SP - 1309

EP - 1314

BT - CHI EA 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts

T2 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011

Y2 - 1 January 2011

ER -

Squeeze vs. tilt: A comparative study using continuous tactile feedback

Abstrakti

Conference

Tutkimusalat

Julkaisufoorumi-taso

Pääsy asiakirjaan

Sormenjälki

Siteeraa tätä