TY - JOUR
T1 - The relationship between temperament, polygenic score for intelligence and cognition
T2 - A population-based study of middle-aged adults
AU - Tölli, Pekka
AU - Keltikangas-Järvinen, Liisa
AU - Lehtimäki, Terho
AU - Ravaja, Niklas
AU - Hintsanen, Mirka
AU - Ahola-Olli, Ari
AU - Pahkala, Katja
AU - Kähönen, Mika
AU - Hutri-Kähönen, Nina
AU - Laitinen, Tomi T.
AU - Tossavainen, Päivi
AU - Taittonen, Leena
AU - Dobewall, Henrik
AU - Jokinen, Eero
AU - Raitakari, Olli
AU - Cloninger, C. Robert
AU - Rovio, Suvi
AU - Saarinen, Aino
N1 - Funding Information:
Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility area of Kuopio, Grant/Award Number: X51001; Diabetestutkimussäätiö; Emil Aaltosen Säätiö; Finnish Society of Clinical Chemistry; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Grant/Award Numbers: 755320, 848146; Juho Vainion Säätiö; Paavo Nurmen Säätiö; Signe ja Ane Gyllenbergin Säätiö; Suomen Akatemia, Grant/Award Numbers: 117787, 121584, 124282, 126925, 129378, 134309, 286284, 322098, 41071; Suomen Kulttuurirahasto; Sydäntutkimussäätiö; Tampere and Turku University Hospitals; Tampere University Hospital Supporting Foundation; Tampereen TuberkuloosisäätiÖ; The Sigrid Juselius Foundation; The Social Insurance Institution of Finland; Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö; Tampere University Hospital; European Research Council, Grant/Award Number: 742927; Horizon 2020; European Union; Finnish Diabetes Association; Diabetes Research Foundation; Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation; Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation; Emil Aaltonen Foundation; Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation; Finnish Cultural Foundation; Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research; Paavo Nurmi Foundation; Juho Vainio Foundation; Academy of Finland Funding information
Funding Information:
The Young Finns Study has been financially supported by the Academy of Finland: grants 322098, 286284, 134309 (Eye), 126925, 121584, 124282, 129378 (Salve), 117787 (Gendi) and 41071 (Skidi); the Social Insurance Institution of Finland; Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility area of Kuopio, Tampere and Turku University Hospitals (grant X51001); Juho Vainio Foundation; Paavo Nurmi Foundation; Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research; Finnish Cultural Foundation; The Sigrid Juselius Foundation; Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation; Emil Aaltonen Foundation; Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation; Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation; Diabetes Research Foundation of Finnish Diabetes Association; This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreements No 848146 for To Aition and grant agreement 755320 for TAXINOMISIS; European Research Council (grant 742927 for MULTIEPIGEN project); Tampere University Hospital Supporting Foundation and Finnish Society of Clinical Chemistry.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Genes, Brain and Behavior published by International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - We investigated whether temperament modifies an association between polygenic intelligence potential and cognitive test performance in midlife. The participants (n = 1647, born between 1962 and 1977) were derived from the Young Finns Study. Temperament was assessed with Temperament and Character Inventory over a 15-year follow-up (1997, 2001, 2007, 2012). Polygenic intelligence potential was assessed with a polygenic score for intelligence. Cognitive performance (visual memory, reaction time, sustained attention, spatial working memory) was assessed with CANTAB in midlife. The PGSI was significantly associated with the overall cognitive performance and performance in visual memory, sustained attention and working memory tests but not reaction time test. Temperament did not correlate with polygenic score for intelligence and did not modify an association between the polygenic score and cognitive performance, either. High persistence was associated with higher visual memory (B = 0.092; FDR-adj. p = 0.007) and low harm avoidance with higher overall cognitive performance, specifically better reaction time (B = −0.102; FDR-adj; p = 0.007). The subscales of harm avoidance had different associations with cognitive performance: higher “anticipatory worry,” higher “fatigability,” and lower “shyness with strangers” were associated with lower cognitive performance, while the role of “fear of uncertainty” was subtest-related. In conclusion, temperament does not help or hinder one from realizing their genetic potential for intelligence. The overall modest relationships between temperament and cognitive performance advise caution if utilizing temperament-related information e.g. in working-life recruitments. Cognitive abilities may be influenced by temperament variables, such as the drive for achievement and anxiety about test performance, but they involve distinct systems of learning and memory.
AB - We investigated whether temperament modifies an association between polygenic intelligence potential and cognitive test performance in midlife. The participants (n = 1647, born between 1962 and 1977) were derived from the Young Finns Study. Temperament was assessed with Temperament and Character Inventory over a 15-year follow-up (1997, 2001, 2007, 2012). Polygenic intelligence potential was assessed with a polygenic score for intelligence. Cognitive performance (visual memory, reaction time, sustained attention, spatial working memory) was assessed with CANTAB in midlife. The PGSI was significantly associated with the overall cognitive performance and performance in visual memory, sustained attention and working memory tests but not reaction time test. Temperament did not correlate with polygenic score for intelligence and did not modify an association between the polygenic score and cognitive performance, either. High persistence was associated with higher visual memory (B = 0.092; FDR-adj. p = 0.007) and low harm avoidance with higher overall cognitive performance, specifically better reaction time (B = −0.102; FDR-adj; p = 0.007). The subscales of harm avoidance had different associations with cognitive performance: higher “anticipatory worry,” higher “fatigability,” and lower “shyness with strangers” were associated with lower cognitive performance, while the role of “fear of uncertainty” was subtest-related. In conclusion, temperament does not help or hinder one from realizing their genetic potential for intelligence. The overall modest relationships between temperament and cognitive performance advise caution if utilizing temperament-related information e.g. in working-life recruitments. Cognitive abilities may be influenced by temperament variables, such as the drive for achievement and anxiety about test performance, but they involve distinct systems of learning and memory.
KW - CANTAB
KW - cognitive abilities
KW - cognitive performance
KW - cognitive test
KW - genetic
KW - GWAS
KW - intelligence
KW - polygenic score
KW - prospective
KW - TCI
KW - temperament
U2 - 10.1111/gbb.12798
DO - 10.1111/gbb.12798
M3 - Article
C2 - 35170850
AN - SCOPUS:85124719642
SN - 1601-1848
VL - 21
JO - GENES BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR
JF - GENES BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR
IS - 4
M1 - e12798
ER -