Abstrakti
In its ruling 2204/2024, the Supreme Administrative Court did not accept the Finnish Tax Administration’s approach to claim, in the conversion of a Finnish entity from a full-fledged operator to a service provider, that the transfer of something of value should have been compensated for without the identification of the “something”. The Finnish Tax Administration’s reassessment, which comprised the difference between the estimated values of the Finnish business before and after the restructuring, was overturned.
| Alkuperäiskieli | Englanti |
|---|---|
| Sivut | 34-40 |
| Sivumäärä | 7 |
| Julkaisu | International Transfer Pricing Journal |
| Vuosikerta | 32 |
| Numero | 1 |
| DOI - pysyväislinkit | |
| Tila | Julkaistu - 2025 |
| OKM-julkaisutyyppi | A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä |
Julkaisufoorumi-taso
- Jufo-taso 0
!!ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
- Law
Sormenjälki
Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'The Supreme Administrative Court’s Ruling on Compensation for a Business Restructuring: The Tax Administration Failed to Identify the Something of Value That Allegedly Had Transferred'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.Siteeraa tätä
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver