Abstrakti
PCDD/F abatement strategies - sulfur pellet addition and peat co-combustion - were tested for a BFB boiler facility utilizing SRF-bark-sludge as fuel. In this paper chemical and physical analyses of electrostatic precipitator ( ESP) fly ashes were used to explain the differences in the performance of these strategies. These analyses revealed a difference between the coarse and fine fly ashes collected in the ESP. Chemical analysis of the fine fly ashes revealed high concentration of easily volatilized elements while the SEM micrographs showed that fine ash are composed of clusters of spherical particles, thereby leading to a conclusion that fine ashes were originally in a gas phase in the high temperature zones of the boiler. Variation in the distribution of active and passive forms of Cu in fly ashes was revealed using X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XANES mode). It was also found that peat co-combustion led to increased formation of Cu oxides that may act as active catalysts in de novo synthesis. Furthermore, XANES revealed the formation of CuSO4 for all the test cases. By applying the empirical ratio between mole fractions of the active and passive species of Cu, the role of Cu speciation to PCDD/F production was emphasized. It is concluded that sulfur pellet addition is more effective than peat addition as a PCDD/F abatement strategy for the BFB facility understudy. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Alkuperäiskieli | Englanti |
---|---|
Sivut | 178-186 |
Sivumäärä | 9 |
Julkaisu | Fuel |
Vuosikerta | 132 |
DOI - pysyväislinkit | |
Tila | Julkaistu - 15 syysk. 2014 |
OKM-julkaisutyyppi | A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä |
Rahoitus
We are thankful to the OSER project, Valmet Power (formerly Metso Power), Foster Wheeler, the European Regional Development Fund and the RECOMBIO project TREN/FP7EN/239530/ for the resources shared for this study. Stora Enso Oyj is gratefully acknowledged for sharing the data presented in this paper. Likewise we are thankful to the staff of BL8 at SLRI for helping in the collection of XANES data. Dr. Nurak Grisdanurak and Dr. Pummarin Khamdahsag are also acknowledged for providing the standards used in this experiment and Dr. Pongtanawat Khemthong for the help on the XAS data analysis. We are also very thankful to Dr. James Penner-Hahn for providing a copy the MBACK algorithm and explaining its usage and features; and to Dr. Bruce Ravel via the IFEFFIT mailing list for pointing out the key details of XAS analysis. Thanks to Matti Ranta-Korpi and Hannu Salo for the SEM micrographs.