TY - JOUR
T1 - Using an oxidation flow reactor to understand the effects of gasoline aromatics and ethanol levels on secondary aerosol formation
AU - Kuittinen, Niina
AU - McCaffery, Cavan
AU - Zimmerman, Stephen
AU - Bahreini, Roya
AU - Simonen, Pauli
AU - Karjalainen, Panu
AU - Keskinen, Jorma
AU - Rönkkö, Topi
AU - Karavalakis, Georgios
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the late Mr. Kurt Bumiller for helping setting up the experiment and dedicate this publication to his memory. We thank Mr. Mark Villela and Mr. Daniel Gomez of the University of California, Riverside for their contribution in conducting testing for this research program. We acknowledge funding from CARTEEH (Center for Advancing Research in Transportation Emissions, Energy, and Health), a US Department of Transportation's University Transportation Center, and USDA-NIFA Hatch (Project No. CA-R-ENS-5072-H , Accession No. 1015963). Niina Kuittinen acknowledges funding from Tampere University Graduate School and the American-Scandinavian Foundation . Niina Kuittinen and Topi Rönkkö acknowledges funding for the Black Carbon Footprint project, granted by Business Finland , Finnish authorities and companies.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Fuel type and composition affect tailpipe emissions and secondary aerosol production from mobile sources. This study assessed the influence of gasoline fuels with varying levels of aromatics and ethanol on the primary emissions and secondary aerosol formation from a flexible fuel vehicle equipped with a port fuel injection engine. The vehicle was exercised over the LA92 and US06 driving cycles using a chassis dynamometer. Secondary aerosol formation potential was measured using a fast oxidation flow reactor. Results showed that the high aromatics fuels led to higher gaseous regulated emissions, as well as particulate matter (PM), black carbon, and total and solid particle number. The high ethanol content fuel (E78) resulted in reductions for the gaseous regulated pollutants and particulate emissions, with some exceptions where elevated emissions were seen for this fuel compared to both E10 fuels, depending on the driving cycle. Secondary aerosol formation potential was dominated by the cold-start phase and increased for the high aromatics fuel. Secondary aerosol formation was seen in lower levels for E78 due to the lower formation of precursor emissions using this fuel. In addition, operating driving conditions and aftertreatment efficiency played a major role on secondary organic and inorganic aerosol formation, indicating that fuel properties, driving conditions, and exhaust aftertreatment should be considered when evaluating the emissions of secondary aerosol precursors from mobile sources.
AB - Fuel type and composition affect tailpipe emissions and secondary aerosol production from mobile sources. This study assessed the influence of gasoline fuels with varying levels of aromatics and ethanol on the primary emissions and secondary aerosol formation from a flexible fuel vehicle equipped with a port fuel injection engine. The vehicle was exercised over the LA92 and US06 driving cycles using a chassis dynamometer. Secondary aerosol formation potential was measured using a fast oxidation flow reactor. Results showed that the high aromatics fuels led to higher gaseous regulated emissions, as well as particulate matter (PM), black carbon, and total and solid particle number. The high ethanol content fuel (E78) resulted in reductions for the gaseous regulated pollutants and particulate emissions, with some exceptions where elevated emissions were seen for this fuel compared to both E10 fuels, depending on the driving cycle. Secondary aerosol formation potential was dominated by the cold-start phase and increased for the high aromatics fuel. Secondary aerosol formation was seen in lower levels for E78 due to the lower formation of precursor emissions using this fuel. In addition, operating driving conditions and aftertreatment efficiency played a major role on secondary organic and inorganic aerosol formation, indicating that fuel properties, driving conditions, and exhaust aftertreatment should be considered when evaluating the emissions of secondary aerosol precursors from mobile sources.
KW - Ethanol blends
KW - Gasoline aromatics
KW - Oxidation flow reactor
KW - Secondary organic aerosol (SOA)
U2 - 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111453
DO - 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111453
M3 - Article
C2 - 34097893
AN - SCOPUS:85107570495
VL - 200
M1 - 111453
ER -